WELCOME GUEST  |  LOG IN
hamptons local events, express news group
27east.com

Story - News

Mar 20, 2013 9:32 AMPublication: The Southampton Press

Trustees, State Question Village Sea Wall Permits

Mar 20, 2013 11:03 AM

Criticism and skepticism continued to be focused on new steel walls erected on ocean beaches by two homeowners in Southampton Village, replacing hardened protections that already existed, ostensibly under emergency conditions created by Superstorm Sandy.

The State Department of Environmental Conservation confirmed that it was investigating the conditions under which permits were granted for the installation of the steel walls. Members of the Southampton Town Trustees also leveled pointed accusations of deception and dishonesty on the part of the property owners and the consultants who represented them in securing permits from the village and the DEC.

“My golly, the tricks people will play,” Town Trustee Fred Havemeyer said. “They drove the steel in behind the bulkhead, 5 feet higher than what is there, claiming they were just replacing an existing bulkhead.”

The steel walls were built by village homeowners Joshua Harris, co-founder of the giant hedge fund Apollo Global Management, and Mark Rachesky, co-chairman of Lions Gate Entertainment, based on permits issued by the Southampton Village Building Department and the DEC. Both properties already had wooden bulkheads across their ocean frontage, built by prior owners many decades ago, but the new structures stand several feet higher than what existed.

The Town Trustees—who have long claimed the right to regulate construction along the beaches and have barred the erection of hardened shoreline structures for 20 years—said that they were cut out of the permitting process by claims that the walls being erected were landward of the natural dune line, the limit of the Trustees’ authority.

While stalwart dunes might have once stood between the ocean and where the steel sheets were pounded into the beachhead, they have been lost to erosion, and in the wake of Sandy just a thin ribbon of sand separates them from the pounding ocean surf. One of the walls, erected last month in front of Mr. Rachesky’s estate, has become what coastal managers refer to as a “wet bulkhead,” meaning that at high tides the ocean laps at its base, the beach having been entirely eroded.

The Trustees are claiming that the owners and their consultants, First Coastal Corporation of Westhampton, have grossly misrepresented the conditions on both of the properties to take advantage of the wording in state permits granted during the post-storm emergency.

“They’ve come in with this pretext that this flimsy old staving, really just some wood planks laid against the dunes, is an old bulkhead,” Mr. Havemeyer said last week after inspecting the new steel wall across the front of one of the estates, off Gin Lane. “The state says that if a bulkhead is existing and functioning, and was damaged by the storm, it can be replaced. But to claim that flim-flam staving was a bulkhead is just preposterous. They’re just thumbing their nose at the DEC.”

The permits issued for the two projects both claim the work will replace an “existing timber bulkhead” in place. The permits require that any new structure be within 18 inches of the original in height. Mr. Havemeyer said that First Coastal had brought an application to the Trustees two years ago for the erection of a steel bulkhead, 5 feet higher than the existing wooden ones, which is buried beneath the sand. The Trustees denied that application. The new steel walls erected last week effectively mirror the one requested at the time, he said, and are based on the height of the staving atop the old bulkhead.

First Coastal Corp. owner Aram Terchunian declined to comment this week on the work done at Mr. Harris and Mr. Rachesky’s properties.

Mr. Havemeyer said that the Trustees have discussed the possibility of suing the homeowners to have the steel sheeting removed or drastically altered, but said they will wait and see what steps the DEC will take.

Bill Fonda, a spokesman for the DEC, confirmed last week that the agency’s staff have visited the site of the two steel walls and are reviewing the details of the permits issued to the homeowners.

The state delegates the authority to issue individual permits under its Coastal Erosion Hazard Area law to local municipal agents, but reserves the right to revoke permits or that authority if it determines the local agents have misrepresented state policy. In 2010, the state issued a report accusing Quogue Village of ignoring the regulations in the state laws and halted the village’s authority to issue permits for more than a year while it investigated permits already issued. Ultimately, the village was allowed to continue its permitting authority after agreeing to a wide range of new steps in the review of applications.

1  |  2  >>  

You've read 1 of 7 free articles this month.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

I understand how village mayors throughout the East End are always going to be pressured to make bad decisions in the short term interest of beachfront property owners. My thanks to the Trustees for being there to prevent them.
By shocean (16), Southampton on Mar 20, 13 12:08 PM
These sea walls should NVER be allowed! Thanks to the Trustees for fighting against them!!
By sandydog21 (195), Southampton on Mar 21, 13 12:40 PM
Does this permit allow for the large boulders which are going in west of the steel bulkhead?
By PBR (4956), Southampton on Mar 25, 13 11:29 AM
The locked version of this article has a quote from Mr. Havemeyer about the height of the new steel bulkhead, which could only have happened because the Trustees did not monitor this situation closely, probably because it was being done under some kind of emergency permit?

Just to be clear, there was never any emergency here.

-- The house is well behind the dune line.

-- The existing wood bulkhead shown in the photo was still basically intact, and the perpendicular "jetties" ...more
By PBR (4956), Southampton on Mar 26, 13 6:51 AM
No worries, however, as Mother Nature will resolve this SNAFU as She wishes, bulkhead or not. The properties to the west should be concerned.
By PBR (4956), Southampton on Mar 26, 13 6:53 AM