
The Tuckahoe man who was arrested and charged last week with stealing $1,800 during a drug-related home invasion-style robbery last fall in Noyac accepted a plea deal on Friday afternoon that will keep him out of jail, according to his lawyer.
Daniel Claud, 19, pleaded guilty to attempted second-degree robbery, a felony, in Suffolk County Criminal Court in Riverhead in exchange for time served and probation, according to his attorney, Daniel Rodgers of Southampton Village. The deal did not involve identifying the other man involved in the robbery, who remains at large, according to Mr. Rodgers.
Mr. Claud was accused of entering a home on Widener Lane in Noyac with another masked man in October 2013 and holding several occupants of the house at gunpoint while stealing $1,800 cash. Town Police Detective Sergeant Lisa Costa said this week that Mr. Claud and his accomplice knew the victims were selling marijuana and would have a large amount of cash in the home. She added that the house was not a known drug dealing location.
After an extensive investigation by detectives, Mr. Claud was arrested by Southampton Town Police last Thursday, May 8, after they picked him up near his home and took him to police headquarters for questioning. He was subsequently charged with first-degree robbery and first-degree burglary, both felonies, as well as fourth-degree criminal possession of a weapon, a misdemeanor.
Both felonies could have carried a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison, while the misdemeanor charge could have carried a maximum sentence of one year.
None of the stolen money has been recovered, and police are still looking for the other suspect.
Mr. Rodgers said the plea deal came about because the prosecution had a weak case against his client that would not have stood up during trial.
“This was a kid that was looking at five to 25 [years] in a state prison based on his original charges—first-degree robbery is taken very seriously,” he said. “This reflects more the weakness of the case than anything.”
Robert Clifford, a spokesman for Suffolk County District Attorney Thomas J. Spota, said the decision was made to offer a plea based on the findings of Mr. Spota’s office and Town Police investigators. “This disposition is based on our criminal investigation of this matter in consultation with the Southampton Town Police Department,” Mr. Clifford said.
Det. Sgt. Costa said that despite the reduced charges, Mr. Claud, who had no previous convictions, still was convicted of a felony and will remain on probation for the next five years, which she said could include random drug testing and searching his home at any given time.
Other than the eight days he spent in the Suffolk County Jail in Riverside, Mr. Claud will serve no additional time behind bars. Mr. Rodgers said the court also granted Mr. Claud, who was 18 at the time of the robbery, youthful offender status, meaning his court documents will be sealed. That status, however, could be revoked by the court if Mr. Claud violates the conditions of his probation.
Mr. Rodgers added that the prosecution originally offered to drop the charges to a lone misdemeanor if Mr. Claud revealed the name of the other suspect, but his client refused. “He didn’t want to jeopardize his safety,” Mr. Rodgers said. “He lives in the area, his family has deep ties in the community, so he made a calculated decision.”
Now that he’s been released, Mr. Claud plans on finishing his senior year at Southampton High School, where he’s an honor student, according to Mr. Rodgers.
If this is the best the East End DA's office can do, Spota needs to clean house -- probably starting with himself!
"He didn’t want to jeopardize his safety," Mr. Rodgers said. "He lives in the area, his family has deep ties in the community, so he made a calculated decision."
What good are "deep ties" in the community if the family lets the other attacker go free, and remain anonymous to the public?
What about the dangerous person wandering around incognito?
How do ...more the victims of the crime feel about this, and how weak was the DA's case when there were eye witnesses to the attack?
Lots of questions to be answered IMO.
They have the capacity to commit the crime and not do the time. They commit the crime without a second though and have no regard for their victims and in the rare instance the do get locked up it's like sleep away camp for the criminally insane where they build the skills to hone their craft. They come out even more dangerous than they were before.
IMO ...more they gave him the milk and cookies plea because the witnesses refused to testify. I wouldn't testify against the guy that held me at gunpoint when his acomplice and other criminal friends were still on the street. The severity of the retaliation would be beyond the capacity of the average 27east readers comprehension.
The DA's office has some explaining to do IMO, plus the SHT PD about the "weak case" with eye witnesses as victims?
Hopefully the Press will dig deeper here . . .
I think the SHPD and SHDA have provided the answer in a clear and concise manner.
Step 1 - Commit crime
Step 2 - Have Dad call the right people to make the problem go away.
Step 3 - Buy and learn how to use weaponry to eliminate Steps 1 and 2
from 10/05/2011 SH Press:
“I stand before you tonight because ...more the unequal treatment must stop,” Mr. Claud told the board. “Protecting some of our children and not all of our children must stop. The disrespect directed to us as parents will not be tolerated any longer.”
He singled out High School Principal Dr. Timothy Mundell. “My child has suffered at the hands of the leadership of the principal in the high school,” Mr. Claud said.
Does it strike anyone else as odd that a victim of relentless bullying decides to conduct a home invasion robbery with hostages at gunpoint?
Bravo Southampton Court!
Did he had to kill someone to be locked?
Next time soon!
My only guess is that the police report couldn't be corroberated (likely no proof there was a gun) and thus their case was very weak. Talk about a slap on the wrist though.
"The attorney added that the prosecution originally offered to drop the charges to a lone misdemeanor if Mr. Claud revealed the name of the other suspect, ...more but he refused.
"He didn’t want to jeopardize his safety," Mr. Rodgers said. "He lives in the area, his family has deep ties in the community, so he made a calculated decision."
Lots of unanswered questions here . . .
The money has not been recovered and the other suspect remains at large. Remind anyone else of Sister Walsh's hit-and-run investigation from almost two years ago?
That being said, even if the lawyer is convinced it would not stand up to trial, who in their right mind would turn down that deal? No harm no foul. He already served the 8 days and the record gets sealed. Going to court would only cost him $$$
" . . . never wanted for anything . . . "
Hopefully this includes the maturity, however nascent, to know what a turning point this could be in his life.
For good or evil . . .
What about the owners of the drug house? Seems like more than one crime was in progress here. Or is dealing drugs OK if you're robbed at gun point?
And shame on the Press - know your town - Widner Lane is in North Sea not Noyac. What other errors did you make in the article?
The prohibition ain't helping...
Meanwhile the real story is happening all around you. The real estate and rental market is looking better this season and when you see how nice the show house is this summer...