hamptons local events, express news group

Story - News

Aug 27, 2013 2:09 PMPublication: The East Hampton Press

Ahead of East Hampton Town Republican Primary, Cantwell Says He Will Decline GOP Nod

Aug 27, 2013 5:49 PM

Larry Cantwell, the East Hampton Town Board supervisor candidate on the Democratic Party line who also has been cross-endorsed by the Independence and Working Families parties, announced on Tuesday that he is declining a Republican nod.

In an emailed statement and follow-up phone interview, Mr. Cantwell said he would mail a candidate declination form to the Suffolk County Board of Elections to make it clear that he is not a candidate in the GOP write-in primary to be held on Tuesday, September 10, despite efforts among some Republicans to urge voters to pencil in his name.

The town’s Republican Party, having missed a petition deadline earlier this summer to field a candidate in the supervisor’s race, filed a petition instead to hold a write-in primary as a last-ditch effort to get a name on the ballot.

The GOP was left without a candidate after former Supervisor Jay Schneiderman turned down the party’s nomination, opting instead to seek reelection to his current post as a county legislator.

“I am doing so now because I do not want Republican voters who may cast a vote in the primary to be misled,” Mr. Cantwell wrote in his statement. “Republicans have every right to select a candidate, and I hope they do,” he added over the phone. “I think the town is better served in an election where there’s more than one choice for supervisor. If I’m the candidate that appears on every line, I think that undermines the voters’ ability to have a choice.”

Should he win the write-in primary, he would not accept the nomination, he said.

The longtime Democrat, who recently retired as East Hampton Village administrator and is seen as a shoo-in to be Republican Supervisor Bill Wilkinson’s successor, said the GOP asked him in May or early June if he would consider screening with it after being selected by the Democratic and Independence parties. He said he declined, saying voters deserve a choice.

The town’s Republican Committee chairman, Kurt Kappel, on Tuesday said Mr. Cantwell had said he was flattered by the offer, but that he had been told by the Democratic Party hierarchy that he was not to accept a GOP nod and upset the apple cart.

As for his statement, Mr. Cantwell said it was prompted, in part, by recent letters to the editor in The East Hampton Star.

In the most recent issue, published on Thursday, August 22, Beverly Bond pressed registered Republicans to write in Mr. Cantwell’s name, saying he would be a “uniting force” for the town. A similar letter from Ms. Bond appears in today’s East Hampton Press.

“He actively decries the us-against-them mentality that has smothered this town and its board meetings for too many years,” she wrote. “Let’s tell Larry that: We Republicans the people—not Republicans the party—want him as our candidate for supervisor, at the head of the Republican ticket in November. To accomplish this, registered Republican voters, go to the polls Sept. 10 and write in Larry Cantwell for supervisor.”

Mr. Cantwell on Tuesday said he hopes the GOP chooses a candidate who wants to debate the serious issues that face the town and noted how, because he has so far been running unopposed, he has not been invited to at least two debates.

“Not having an opponent, in effect, is denying opportunities to present my vision of the future in East Hampton,” he said. “It’s another reason why I would encourage the Republicans to choose a candidate.”

Mr. Kappel on Tuesday called Mr. Cantwell’s decision odd, given that he has not officially received the nod.

Committee vice chairman Tom Knobel said he was unaware of Mr. Cantwell’s declination on Tuesday morning when reached by phone, but called it disappointing and unnecessary.

“I’m not aware that you can preemptively decline what you don’t have,” he said. “I’m frankly surprised that he’d want to declare to his potential constituents—a substantial section of them—that he doesn’t want them. That’s a disappointment.”

Asked about Mr. Cantwell’s reasoning, Mr. Knobel noted that it’s dealing in hypotheticals about a candidacy the Democrat does not yet have, but noted that the Democratic Party actively solicited and cross-endorsed already designated GOP candidates in the races for highway superintendent and town clerk.

“It’s baffling to me that there could be some inhibition about accepting the Republican nomination in turn,” he said. “It’s very peculiar that it doesn’t extend to all the citizens of the town, that all this talk of unity is a sham.

“He doesn’t need to file a declination,” he continued. There’s some form of statement here, but it’s an unnecessary one. The question is, why doesn’t he want to represent Republicans?”

Mr. Cantwell wrote in his letter that should he win election, with or without opposition, his style of governing, building consensus and seeking compromise, will serve everyone well.

Mr. Knobel added that he wrote a letter to The Star for publication this week, saying that he believes Mr. Cantwell would be a good selection.

He said the primary results will largely depend on turnout. Voters involved in law enforcement may turn out in big numbers, he said, because of their interest in primaries for the county district attorney and sheriff’s races, also to be held that day.

Mr. Cantwell, meanwhile, concluded his statement by saying that adding his name to the Republican ticket would call into question his support for his Democratic running mates.

You've read 1 of 7 free articles this month.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Wow! More concerned with "Party Line" than the good of the Town. Very, very disappointing.
By Board Watcher (534), East Hampton on Aug 27, 13 4:52 PM
Your summary is incorrect IMO.

If anything, Mr. Cantwell's decision appears to have the good of the Town as its primary goal:

"I think the town is better served in an election where there’s more than one choice for supervisor."

At first read, Mr. Cantwell's decision struck me as a fresh breath of air, from a candidate who does not feel the need to sell his soul to every party which comes a'knockin'.

He welcomes, indeed is inviting, a public discourse on ...more
By PBR (4956), Southampton on Aug 27, 13 5:14 PM
1 member liked this comment
Oh come on PBR - Larry Cantwell and the whole Town knows that whoever is "written in" is not going to be able to mount a successful campaign in 6 weeks. He has stated his views and policies openly, what is there for him to debate? I'm sure there will be a groundswell of "public discourse" after the election. So I don't see it your way, PBR, and I think it's a kick to the Independence Party as well when he is quoted as saying "adding his name to the Republican ticket would call into question his ...more
By Board Watcher (534), East Hampton on Aug 27, 13 9:06 PM
Tom Spota should take a page out of Mr Cantwell's book. His desire to see that voters get a choice is admirable. Tom Spota wants to make sure that Suffolk County voters have no other choice but him in November. Imagine the gall of the top crime fighter to get elected under term limits and then when he is affected by that law, he sues in court and overturns the wishes of the voters.
By fuou812 (59), Oakdale on Aug 27, 13 7:35 PM
1 member liked this comment
The republican parties across the county are disintegrating right before our very eyes. The problem lies with leadership or more to the point, the lack of leadership. These back room cross endorsement deals are slaps in the face to the rank and file faithful. Time to clean house and remove all the current political leaders. Every election for any office should have at least one republican and one democratic candidate. That's the American way that gives the people a voice in the process.
By fuou812 (59), Oakdale on Aug 28, 13 10:10 AM
1 member liked this comment
And how about the Independence party voters - they count as .... nothing ??? By the way, not that I blame anyone, I didn't see a lot of Republicans coming out of the woodwork in EH who WANTED the job ... or did I miss something. Clue me in PBR ... who "should have" run? Who WANTED to? And on a "unity" theme to boot? Larry Cantwell, that's who. So if rank and file, grassroot Republicans want him in, and write him in - he is going to say "No"? I don't know - seems suspect to me!
By Board Watcher (534), East Hampton on Aug 28, 13 10:27 PM
If I could I would write in Bill Wilkinson next week --- Larry wants a "debate"? I believe the public would hear some "facts" and see a real debate in a Bill vs. Larry "State of the Union" address. Can Wilkinson just show up and do it anyway? Please?
By Board Watcher (534), East Hampton on Sep 5, 13 9:58 PM